“…2,31 Almost all papers, 107 out of 112, investigated a comparator to network measures. The most common of which were comparisons such as between players (n = 44), [32][33][34] teams (n = 51), [35][36][37] matches (n = 20) [38][39][40] and positions (n = 39). [41][42][43] Beyond these, spatial, temporal, predictive, location, goals and goal attempts were explored amongst other comparators.…”