2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-002-1125-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of multiplex simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers to complement distinctness, uniformity and stability testing of rape (Brassica napus L.) varieties

Abstract: To assess the potential of multiplex SSR markers for testing distinctness, uniformity and stability of rape (Brassica napus L.) varieties, we developed three multiplex SSR sets composed of five markers each. These were used to measure the extent of diversity within and between a set of ten varieties using a fluorescence-based semi-automated detection technology. Also, we evaluated the significance of any correlation between SSRs, pedigree and five of the morphological characters currently used for statutory di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
1
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
70
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a variety of DNA marker techniques, such as random amplified polymorphic sequence (RAPD) (Juchum et al, 2007;Ro et al, 2007), amplified restriction fragment polymorphism (AFLP) (Percifield, 2007;Yuan et al, 2007) and microsatellite markers (SSR) (Legesse et al, 2007;Tommasini et al, 2003). They are widely applied in species or varieties identification, evaluation of genetic diversity, but few reports are available on systematically comparative analysis of two kinds of testing approaches, such as morphological method and molecular marker method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a variety of DNA marker techniques, such as random amplified polymorphic sequence (RAPD) (Juchum et al, 2007;Ro et al, 2007), amplified restriction fragment polymorphism (AFLP) (Percifield, 2007;Yuan et al, 2007) and microsatellite markers (SSR) (Legesse et al, 2007;Tommasini et al, 2003). They are widely applied in species or varieties identification, evaluation of genetic diversity, but few reports are available on systematically comparative analysis of two kinds of testing approaches, such as morphological method and molecular marker method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…그러나, 인삼의 경우 외부 형태적 특성에 의한 유전자원의 평가는 유 전자형과 환경 간의 상호작용과 해가림 시설 등 재배방법에 따라서 표현형이 달라지기 때문에 적당하지 않다. 이러한 문 제점을 보완하기 위하여, 환경에 영향을 받지 않는 DNA 마 커를 이용한 유전적 다양성 분석과 품종 판별 에 관한 연구가 진행되어, 오이 (Bernet et al, 2003), 대청 , 유채 (Tommasini et al, 2003), 고추 (Kwon et al, 2005), 밀 (Noil et al, 2008), 사과 (Cho et al, 2010 (Wu and Tanksley, 1993;Saghai-Maroof et al, 1994;Morgante et al, 1995;Ogbonnaya et al, 2008).…”
unclassified
“…Genotype diversity is a measure of uniformity of individuals within a cultivar/accession, and ranges from 0 to 1 with zero indicating no variation within the cultivar/accession [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powermarker was also used to calculate heterozygosity [19] and polymorphism information content (PIC) [20], while genotype diversity was calculated as described by Tommasini et al [21].…”
Section: Molecular Marker Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%