2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-010-0157-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of new algorithms for remote sensing of snow conditions based on data from the catchment of Øvre Heimdalsvatn and the vicinity

Abstract: The catchment of Øvre Heimdalsvatn and the surrounding area was established as a site for snow remote sensing algorithm development, calibration and validation in 1997. Information on snow cover and snowmelt are important for understanding the timing and scale of many lake ecosystem processes. Field campaigns combined with data from airborne sensors and spaceborne high-resolution sensors have been used as reference data in experiments over many years. Several satellite sensors have been utilised in the develop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to GlobSnow, the SWE retrieval based solely on passive microwave radiometer data shows spurious features during snowmelt and would overestimate SWE because of strong thermal gradients and erroneous forest cover correction factors (Hancock, Huntley, Ellis, & Baxter, ). In this study, we use the GlobSnow SWE product with mountainous regions unmasked, and restrict our analysis to pixels with SWE estimates larger than a previously suggested minimum detectable value of 15 mm since shallow snowpack could be missed by microwave sensors (Solberg et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to GlobSnow, the SWE retrieval based solely on passive microwave radiometer data shows spurious features during snowmelt and would overestimate SWE because of strong thermal gradients and erroneous forest cover correction factors (Hancock, Huntley, Ellis, & Baxter, ). In this study, we use the GlobSnow SWE product with mountainous regions unmasked, and restrict our analysis to pixels with SWE estimates larger than a previously suggested minimum detectable value of 15 mm since shallow snowpack could be missed by microwave sensors (Solberg et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the unique sensing characteristics of SAR, the snow information recorded in SAR imagery is fundamentally different when compared to optical/multispectral imagery. The former records surface characteristics related to the roughness and dielectric properties; the latter records the reflection/absorption of the incoming solar irradiation at the top layer of the surface [68]. As snow, ice, and clouds are characterized by comparatively similar reflection properties in the visible and-depending on the cloud phase-the near to medium infrared part of the spectrum, confusions can occur when attempting to classify snow cover and discriminate it from ice or clouds [69,70].…”
Section: Sar Sensor Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide snow monitoring service in Scandinavia and the European Alps, the concept has been applied in the EO-HYDRO project within ESA's Earth Observation Market Development (EOMD) program [252]. Later, Solberg et al [253] presented and summarized the confidence index based multi-sensor algorithm for snow cover and snowmelt monitoring for Norway and Sweden using MODIS-Terra and ENVISAT -ASAR data time series.…”
Section: Operational Snow Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%