1959
DOI: 10.1002/ar.1091330105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of non‐myotomic muscles of the chick embryo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1975
1975

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of accumulation of these substances is not uniform, however, pointing, perhaps, to an asynchrony in cytodifferentiation of the muscles. Such an asynchrony has been observed directly (Holtzer et al, 1957;Kittiyakara, 1959)-A steady rise in total protein is a characteristic of development. The muscle mass increased about five-fold in the skeletal muscles and 30-fold in the heart muscle between the 12th and 20th d of incubation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The rate of accumulation of these substances is not uniform, however, pointing, perhaps, to an asynchrony in cytodifferentiation of the muscles. Such an asynchrony has been observed directly (Holtzer et al, 1957;Kittiyakara, 1959)-A steady rise in total protein is a characteristic of development. The muscle mass increased about five-fold in the skeletal muscles and 30-fold in the heart muscle between the 12th and 20th d of incubation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Figure 5 indicates that by the third day of microdrop culture the number of syncytial nuclei is almost twice the total number of nuclei present at 24 hours. Even assuming that all of the nuclei present at 24 hours are of myogenic cells, an assumption not supported by the multiplicity of cell types observed in culture, this is a clear indication of proliferative activity on the part of the myogenic elements.…”
Section: Nuclear Countsmentioning
confidence: 96%