2009
DOI: 10.1515/mks-2009-922-306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development of Offending from Age 8 to Age 50: Recent Results from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
203
1
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
203
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the very low‐rate offenders exhibited very little offending from ages 18 to 50; the high‐rate late‐onset escalators did not begin offending until their early 20s but continued to increase their offending frequency over time to age 50; the initially high‐rate desisters were offending at a fairly high rate at age 18 before demonstrating a gradual decline in their mid‐to‐late 20s/early 30s and appearing to desist by early/mid 40s; and the high‐rate chronic offenders increased their offending frequency from age 18 through their early/mid 30s before peaking at age 34 and then gradually declining but still offending at a high rate to age 50. For the most part, these trajectories resembled those estimated in other well‐known and comprehensive life‐course analyses using data collected from the virtually all‐white samples in the Gluecks' sample of juvenile delinquents (Laub and Sampson ; Sampson and Laub ), the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development's South London males (Piquero, Farrington, and Blumstein ; see also Farrington, Piquero, and Jennings ), and the Dutch serious offender cohort (Blokland, Nagin, and Nieuwbeerta ; see Table ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Specifically, the very low‐rate offenders exhibited very little offending from ages 18 to 50; the high‐rate late‐onset escalators did not begin offending until their early 20s but continued to increase their offending frequency over time to age 50; the initially high‐rate desisters were offending at a fairly high rate at age 18 before demonstrating a gradual decline in their mid‐to‐late 20s/early 30s and appearing to desist by early/mid 40s; and the high‐rate chronic offenders increased their offending frequency from age 18 through their early/mid 30s before peaking at age 34 and then gradually declining but still offending at a high rate to age 50. For the most part, these trajectories resembled those estimated in other well‐known and comprehensive life‐course analyses using data collected from the virtually all‐white samples in the Gluecks' sample of juvenile delinquents (Laub and Sampson ; Sampson and Laub ), the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development's South London males (Piquero, Farrington, and Blumstein ; see also Farrington, Piquero, and Jennings ), and the Dutch serious offender cohort (Blokland, Nagin, and Nieuwbeerta ; see Table ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Drug use-related problems in the family have been identified time and again as being a factor that has a strong correlation with an early onset of drug use by adolescents (e.g., DeLisi, 2005;Farrington, 1995). Focusing on adolescents who were brought up by a substancedependent parent, we found specific subjective themes that affected the participants' involvement with (or refrain from) drug use and addiction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The CSDD is a prospective longitudinal survey of the development of offending and antisocial behaviour in a cohort of 411 boys born mostly in 1953, in an inner London area (Farrington, Coid, & West, 2009). The male and key informants, including parents and teachers, have been interviewed regularly since the male were aged 8.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%