Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The article presents the results of research on the wool productivity of crossbreeds when fed compound feed with a mineral-phytobiotic additive. The object of research was the use of bright ones, obtained from breeding crossbred ewes "in themselves" (3/4P x 3/4C). For research, two groups of 20-day local ditches of 25 heads each were formed. The young of the control group received a balanced compound feed, and the experimental group received the same compound feed to which was added 1,8% of a mineral-phytobiotic additive, which included metasilicate and sodium sulfate (a mineral particle) and extracts of essential oils of chili pepper, oregano and cinnamon ( phytobiotic part). As a result of the conducted research, it was established that the addition of a mineral-phytobiotic additive significantly improves wool productivity. In particular, the shearing of unwashed and clean wool and the yield of clean fiber were higher by 14,93%, respectively, in the yaks of the research group; 20,66% and 5,15%. The coefficient of wooliness in the lambs of the experimental group was 44,24 g/kg body weight. m., and in animals of the control group this indicator was at the level of 42,51 g/kg body weight. m., or 4,07 % lower Adding a mineral-phytobiotic supplement to the ration of goats helps to increase the natural and true length of wool at shearing by 9,01 and 8,95 %, respectively, compared to the control group. In the pits of the experimental group, the wool fibers became more uniform in terms of tonnage, the number of individuals with wool of quality 56 increased (70%; average fiber tonnage 28,35 μm), while in the pits of the control group of animals with wool of this quality there was 30% with an average tonnage of wool fibers 28,75 μm. In the experimental group, the strength of the wool was 9,29 km, and in the control group, the breaking length was 7,97 km, or 16,56 % greater.
The article presents the results of research on the wool productivity of crossbreeds when fed compound feed with a mineral-phytobiotic additive. The object of research was the use of bright ones, obtained from breeding crossbred ewes "in themselves" (3/4P x 3/4C). For research, two groups of 20-day local ditches of 25 heads each were formed. The young of the control group received a balanced compound feed, and the experimental group received the same compound feed to which was added 1,8% of a mineral-phytobiotic additive, which included metasilicate and sodium sulfate (a mineral particle) and extracts of essential oils of chili pepper, oregano and cinnamon ( phytobiotic part). As a result of the conducted research, it was established that the addition of a mineral-phytobiotic additive significantly improves wool productivity. In particular, the shearing of unwashed and clean wool and the yield of clean fiber were higher by 14,93%, respectively, in the yaks of the research group; 20,66% and 5,15%. The coefficient of wooliness in the lambs of the experimental group was 44,24 g/kg body weight. m., and in animals of the control group this indicator was at the level of 42,51 g/kg body weight. m., or 4,07 % lower Adding a mineral-phytobiotic supplement to the ration of goats helps to increase the natural and true length of wool at shearing by 9,01 and 8,95 %, respectively, compared to the control group. In the pits of the experimental group, the wool fibers became more uniform in terms of tonnage, the number of individuals with wool of quality 56 increased (70%; average fiber tonnage 28,35 μm), while in the pits of the control group of animals with wool of this quality there was 30% with an average tonnage of wool fibers 28,75 μm. In the experimental group, the strength of the wool was 9,29 km, and in the control group, the breaking length was 7,97 km, or 16,56 % greater.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.