2000
DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2000.0121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of phonemic categorization in children aged 6–12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

32
271
3
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
32
271
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings concur with other research suggesting that children are less adept than adults at comprehending speech in ideal (Hazan & Barrett, 2000;Ohde & Haley, PRESCHOOL ACCENT COMPREHENSION 1997) and non-ideal listening conditions (Fallon et al, 2000(Fallon et al, , 2002. Findings of non-adultlike accent comprehension in young children are also consistent with accounts of protracted perceptual development (e.g.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…These findings concur with other research suggesting that children are less adept than adults at comprehending speech in ideal (Hazan & Barrett, 2000;Ohde & Haley, PRESCHOOL ACCENT COMPREHENSION 1997) and non-ideal listening conditions (Fallon et al, 2000(Fallon et al, , 2002. Findings of non-adultlike accent comprehension in young children are also consistent with accounts of protracted perceptual development (e.g.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…At the nonspeech level, this is in line with (1) physiological animal studies showing that neural coding for temporal aspects of the stimulus reaches maturity later than neural coding for frequency selectivity (Eggermont, 1996), and with (2) behavioral auditory studies in humans providing evidence for a more prolonged development of the sensitivity for temporal than for nontemporal auditory cues (Hartley, Wright, Hogan, & Moore, 2000), even after accounting for the effect of procedure-related skills (Dawes & Bishop, 2008). At the speech level, it coincides with behavioral speech perception studies demonstrating that the identification of stop consonants is not yet mature by the age of 11 (Hazan & Barrett, 2000;Johnson, 2000;Krause, 1982;Simon & Fourcin, 1978;Medina, Hoonhorst, Bogliotti, & Serniclaes, 2010), whereas the identification of vowels does only slightly, though not significantly, improves towards adolescence (Pursell, Swanson, Hedrick, & Nabelek, 2002;Ohde, Haley, & McMahon, 1996;Johnson, 2000, but see Walley and Flege, 1999). Further elaboration on this topic is needed, but the indication that perception of sounds with temporal versus nontemporal cues follows different maturational trajectories in both normal and dyslexic readers, may have practical implications with regard to auditory temporal training programs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Nonetheless, Hazan and Barrett (2000) have reported that children as old as 12 years of age are less consistent than adults in their identification of consonants. On average, children place their speech category boundaries in the same location as adults do, and changes in phonetic context have similar effects on the location of those boundaries.…”
Section: Flexibility In the Use Of Acoustic Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hazan and Barrett (2000) found that children were more consistent in identification when multiple cues were available compared to when only a single cue was available suggesting that children lack the flexibility to use whatever cue was available. Nittrouer et al (2000) came to a similar conclusion in a study of 5-and 7-year-old children, and Johnson's (2000) observation that even 15-year-olds performed more poorly than adults in speech identification in the presence of noise or reverberation also is consistent with this idea.…”
Section: Flexibility In the Use Of Acoustic Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%