Phonological awareness is one of the most significant findings in research on reading in the last century (e.g., Mattingly 1972). The effect of phonological awareness has been attested by correlation studies, cross-sectional studies, longitudinal studies, and experimental intervention studies. These studies consistently show that phonological awareness is strongly correlated with reading acquisition, and in fact, it could be considered as the driving force of reading (Adams 1994). Interestingly, although phonological awareness is well attested in many languages and in most bilingual studies, the empirical data do not consistently support the relationship between phonological awareness and Chinese reading (Huang and Hanley 1995; Taylor 2002; Tzeng and Chen 曾世杰, 陳淑麗 2007). Given the inconsistent results, can they be attributed to the unique feature(s) of Chinese phonology, Chinese orthography, or other factors?
Theoretical BackgroundResearch on phonological awareness and reading typically assume a simple processing model of reading with two basic components: word recognition (decoding) and language comprehension (Hoover and Gough 1990). The stages of reading development evolve from the stage of learning to read to the stage of reading to learn, with the transition occurring typically at the fourth grade. Learning to decode or sounding out a word is a critical factor in reading development (Chall 1983), while decoding a word is dependent on the development of phonological awareness and phonics (NICHD 2000). Previous studies on languages with alphabetic writing systems often assume that phonological awareness refers to the ability to represent and manipulate speech sound; and phonics the ability to segment the letter