The Development of Reasoning about the Teaching of Values in School and Family Contexts

Abstract

This study investigated children's, adolescents', and young adults' reasoning about the teaching of a variety of values in the school and family contexts. One-hundred and sixty participants in four age groups (8-, 10-, and 13-year-olds, and college students) evaluated acts involving the teaching of values and laws that regulate the teaching of these values. Both the valence (positive or negative) of values and the context in which they were presented (school, family) were systematically varied. Results showed that a variety of factors were considered in evaluating the teaching of values, including context, the valence of the value, and the type of value being taught. Participants' reasoning about values education was found to be multifaceted and included distinctions between moral values that reflect justice and rights, and values that reflect other forms of personality traits and social values. The findings suggest that conceptions of values education may be better understood within models of social reasoning that draw distinctions between types of values (e.g., moral and other values) and account for the increasing capacity to differentiate social contexts and spheres of legitimate governmental regulation with development.

Design of Values Education in School For Adolescents

“…The issue of values education has become a major part of the educational policy agenda of many nations around the world [3][4] [5][6] [7] . Ref.…”

Challenges to Values Education in Hong Kong School Music Education

“…It is also meant to instil national and civic responsibilities that are acceptable to society and the authority of the state. As a result, the issue of values education has become a major part of the educational policy agenda of many nations around the world (Arweck, Nesbitt, & Jackson, 2005;Holmes & Crossley, 2004;Prencipe & Helwig, 2002;Taplin, 2002;Tatto, Arellano, Tapia, Varela, & Rodriguez, 2001;Waghid, 2004). Green (1997) believed that a common thread exists among the different forms of values education.…”

International education, values and attitudes: A critical analysis of the International Baccalaureate (IB) Learner Profile

“…They add that ordinary conversation with adults, and the teaching methodology used, can also convey values, even though this may not be intentional (Halstead and Taylor, 2000). This hidden curriculum and the observation that different children may respond to the same stimulus in different ways, including the possibility of gender differences (Prencipe and Helwig, 2002), imply that there is no one-toone correspondence between a teacher's conscious or subconscious intentions concerning the values she or he is conveying and the effect that she or he has on the student(s) (Silcock and Duncan, 2001).…”