2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13169063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development of SF6 Green Substitute Gas

Abstract: Due to its high greenhouse effect, the use of SF6 as the main insulating gas is restricted in the electric power field. Along with the aim of environmental protection, the search for new alternative gases with a lower greenhouse effect and higher insulation strength has received a lot of attention. The properties of alternative gases have a vital impact on the performance of medium-voltage power distribution equipment. Firstly, based on the existing liquefaction temperatures of SF6/N2, SF6/CO2, and SF6/CF4, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its extremely low concentration in the atmosphere, SF 6 has a 22 800 times greater greenhouse effect compared to carbon dioxide. [42][43][44] As a material suitable for gas adsorption, MOCs have demonstrated their excellence as candidates for encapsulating SF 6 gas. In 2011, Nitschke and co-workers reported a water soluble tetrahedron MOC-10 through coordination-driven self-assembly (Fig.…”
Section: Greenhouse Gas Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its extremely low concentration in the atmosphere, SF 6 has a 22 800 times greater greenhouse effect compared to carbon dioxide. [42][43][44] As a material suitable for gas adsorption, MOCs have demonstrated their excellence as candidates for encapsulating SF 6 gas. In 2011, Nitschke and co-workers reported a water soluble tetrahedron MOC-10 through coordination-driven self-assembly (Fig.…”
Section: Greenhouse Gas Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kieffel and colleagues [24] investigated the dielectric performance of g 3 compared to SF 6 under lightning impulse, and the result shows that its dielectric performance at 0.67 to 0.82 MPa is equivalent to between 87% and 96% of that of SF 6 at 0.55 MPa. In case of the dry air, which is composed of N 2 and O 2 , Jiang and colleagues [25] concluded that the dielectric strength of dry air is higher than that of N 2 and O 2 at 0.5 MPa. In addition, Li and colleagues [26] studied the impulse insulation characteristics of dry air according to gas pressure, and the results show that a 50% breakdown voltage of dry air is approximately three times lower than that of SF 6 at the same pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%