1986
DOI: 10.1159/000273024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development of Social Attributions: An Integration of Probability and Logic

Abstract: A descriptive account of social attribution development is presented, based upon a review of the pertinent literature. Research on the development of probability and logical concepts is briefly reviewed, and the relevance of these concepts for attribution development is discussed. A dialectical chronology of attribution development is proposed, based on the relative predominance of logical and probability concepts at each level. Three levels are proposed: preoperational subjectivism, operational objectivism, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models applying a developmental perspective on issues related to the acquisition of social and political attitudes often propose a stage-sequence development (Adelson & O"eil1, 1966;Allport, 1954;Eisert & Kahle, 1986;Enright & Lapsley, 1981;Mladenka & Hill, 1975;Quarter, 1984). According to these models the developmental sequence moves from a fragmented cognitive structure, based on concrete and situation-specific instances, to coherent and structured attitudes, highly differentiated and integrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models applying a developmental perspective on issues related to the acquisition of social and political attitudes often propose a stage-sequence development (Adelson & O"eil1, 1966;Allport, 1954;Eisert & Kahle, 1986;Enright & Lapsley, 1981;Mladenka & Hill, 1975;Quarter, 1984). According to these models the developmental sequence moves from a fragmented cognitive structure, based on concrete and situation-specific instances, to coherent and structured attitudes, highly differentiated and integrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Piaget (Piaget & Inhelder, 1951/1975 argued that young children do not distinguish random from non-random events. For them a causal relation may carry no implication of necessity or reliability (Eisert & Kahle, 1986;Sedlak & Kurtz, 1981). For example, Siegler (1976) found that an imperfect correlation did not discourage five-year-olds from identifying a relation as causal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%