2007
DOI: 10.5964/ejop.v3i4.417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development of the Brief Social Desirability Scale (BSDS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter, internal consistency of that size is similar to that found elsewhere, including the original cross-validation study of the scale (Strahan & Gerbasi, 1972) and is con-sidered sufficient for this particular instrument (Haghighat, 2007).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In the latter, internal consistency of that size is similar to that found elsewhere, including the original cross-validation study of the scale (Strahan & Gerbasi, 1972) and is con-sidered sufficient for this particular instrument (Haghighat, 2007).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…And finally, we added a validated measure of social desirability-participants' tendency to give socially desirable answers (Haghighat, 2007). The materials were as in Study 1, except for the following changes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 = Not at all uncomfortable to 5 = Extremely uncomfortable. And finally, we added a validated measure of social desirability-participants' tendency to give socially desirable answers (Haghighat, 2007). Participants responded to four items (e.g., "Do you always practice what you preach to people?").…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temporal orientation, environmental orientation and PECB measures were all assessed using 5-point scales. Finally, given the general concern raised regarding socially desirable responding on environmental surveys (Milfont, 2009), a 4-item social desirability scale was included (Haghighat, 2007).…”
Section: Survey Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%