This paper starts from the assumption that learning is promoted through confronting students with the inconsistencies entailed by their own beliefs. The issue is explored in the domain of Newtonian dynamics in the context of one or more moving particles. Previous work is used as the basis for the construction of a programme of work that is undertaken by a group of students. This programme entailed the development of a computer-based modelling environment called DYNLAB. The underlying design principle is that students should be able to model the agencies involved at a level which permits them to express some of their explicit (possibly mistaken) beliefs about relevant concepts. Other, implicit, beliefs should also be detectable through use of the system. The results derived from observation suggest that computer-based modelling facilities can provide advantages over approaches exploiting other media. In particular, such systems can be used to promote the kinds of intellectual conflict that are believed to be beneficial.
Starting with misconceptionsIn one of the best known pieces of recent work on misconceptions in science, diSessa described a program called TARGET (diSessa, 1982). This was used as part of the Brookline Project, which attempted to evaluate the effect of providing 6th grade elementary school children with the programming language LOGO. The TARGET program entailed the manipulation of a DYNATURTLE.The DYNATURTLE of diSessa is an extension of the idea of the normal LOGO turtle, a small robot whose state is characterized in terms of its position and its heading, in that its state incorporates velocity information. Its position is changed by changing its velocity. The commands that change its heading are L for LEFT 30 °, R for RIGHT 30 °, and the command that changes its velocity is K for KICK one unit.Six students were each given up to ten hours with the DYNATURTLE in which they were asked to hit a target with the DYNATURTLE moving as slowly as possible. The DYNATURTLE starts from rest and the target is 45 ° from the heading of the DYNATURTLE. An analysis of the students revealed some interesting tendencies.In particular, the students tried a particularly Aristotelian strategy of kicking the DYNATURTLE when it was pointing toward the target and still moving with a component of velocity at right angles to the target's direction as shown in figure 1.