1997
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/48.8.1599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of the grape berry cuticle in relation to susceptibility to bunch rot disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is negligible relative to the 136% increase in A fruit during fruit development, suggesting that (i) almost a constant amount of CM and wax covered a signi®cantly larger A fruit and (ii) there was essentially no formation of new CM material counteracting the thinning of the CM as A fruit increased. Similarly, for grape berries Commenil et al (1997) reported a 2.5-fold decrease in CM mass per unit area between 30 and 60 DAFB, but here wax mass per unit area increased 1.8-fold. For tomato fruit, both CM and wax mass per unit area increased along with an increase in fruit diameter (Baker et al 1982), indicating that marked dierences exist between fruit of dierent species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This is negligible relative to the 136% increase in A fruit during fruit development, suggesting that (i) almost a constant amount of CM and wax covered a signi®cantly larger A fruit and (ii) there was essentially no formation of new CM material counteracting the thinning of the CM as A fruit increased. Similarly, for grape berries Commenil et al (1997) reported a 2.5-fold decrease in CM mass per unit area between 30 and 60 DAFB, but here wax mass per unit area increased 1.8-fold. For tomato fruit, both CM and wax mass per unit area increased along with an increase in fruit diameter (Baker et al 1982), indicating that marked dierences exist between fruit of dierent species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The cuticle is mainly built up by a network of cutin and hydrophobic waxes, with a thickness between some nanometers to some micrometers in: grape (Vitis vinifera) 1-4 μm; tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) 4-10 μm; apple (Malus domestica) 30 μm. 5,6 For fruits cuticles are very efficient transport barriers. Cutin is a polyester like biopolymer, composed of hydroxyl and hydroxyepoxy fatty acids, and in some cases also by cutan, which consists of polymethylene chains or by cellulose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these are the physical, morphological and/or anatomical barriers formed by the skin tissue, between the inner grape and its external environment. On the one hand, a higher frequency of cracks and pores at the berry surface increases fruit susceptibility by creating entry points for penetration by conidial germ tubes of the pathogen (Commeli et al 1997;Mlikota-Gabler et al 2003). On the other hand, the number and thickness of epidermal and hypodermal cell layers have been positively correlated with resistance to B. cinerea (Mlikota-Gabler et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the number and thickness of epidermal and hypodermal cell layers have been positively correlated with resistance to B. cinerea (Mlikota-Gabler et al 2003). Physical resistance to infection also depends on the cuticle and wax content as well as the cell wall structure and composition in the berry skin (Commeli et al 1997;Mlikota-Gabler et al 2003;Vorwerk et al 2004). Furthermore, cluster compactness has been shown to increase berry susceptibility to B. cinerea by affecting both skin morphology and fruit microclimate (Fermaud et al 2001;Percival et al 1993;Vail and Marois 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%