1976
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/2.2.198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Developmental Approach and Process-reactive Schizophrenia: A Review*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the process-reactive dimension, based on distinctions between good and poor premorbid social and sexual adjustment and measured by part I of the Phillips Scale (Phillips 1953), has been among the most important ways of categorizing schizophrenia in the psychological literature. Literally thousands of studies have been based on the process-reactive dimension and on good vs. poor premorbid social adjustment—two related, but not necessarily identical, concepts (DeWolfe 1968; Garmezy 1970; Fowles et al 1970; Higgins 1971; Chapman and Chapman 1973; Evans, Goldstein, and Rodnick 1973; Bromet, Harrow, and Kasl 1974; Strauss and Carpenter 1974; Putterman and Pollack 1976; Quitkin, Rifkin, and Klein 1976).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the process-reactive dimension, based on distinctions between good and poor premorbid social and sexual adjustment and measured by part I of the Phillips Scale (Phillips 1953), has been among the most important ways of categorizing schizophrenia in the psychological literature. Literally thousands of studies have been based on the process-reactive dimension and on good vs. poor premorbid social adjustment—two related, but not necessarily identical, concepts (DeWolfe 1968; Garmezy 1970; Fowles et al 1970; Higgins 1971; Chapman and Chapman 1973; Evans, Goldstein, and Rodnick 1973; Bromet, Harrow, and Kasl 1974; Strauss and Carpenter 1974; Putterman and Pollack 1976; Quitkin, Rifkin, and Klein 1976).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%