“…There was palpable excitement in these early days that an extra dimension to the fossil record had been revealed and evolutionary biologists would soon be integrating the embryology of trilobites, ammonites, and anomalocaridids, with that of their living kin, effecting tests of developmental evolution that would be as direct as possible without the aid of a time machine, settling centuries-old debates over the plesiomorphy of gastrulation modes and the like . Indeed, embryos and larvae of a great diversity of animals have been reported, including stem-metazoans (Hagadorn et al 2006 ), sponges (Chen et al 2000(Chen et al , 2009a, cnidarians (Bengtson and Yue 1997 ;Kouchinsky et al 1999 ;Yue and Bengtson 1999 ;Chen et al 2000Chen et al , 2002Chen et al , 2009aChen and Chi 2005 ;Dong et al 2013 ), ctenophores (Chen et al 2007 ), bilaterians generally (Chen et al 2000(Chen et al , 2006(Chen et al , 2009a, or, more specifi cally, arthropods and scalidophorans (Dong et al 2004Donoghue et al 2006a ;Steiner et al 2014 ), the majority of which are from the Ediacaran Doushantuo Formation and the Early Cambrian Kuanchuanpu Formation, both of South China. Not all of these interpretations have withstood scrutiny, principally because palaeobiologists and embryologists have been unprepared in interpreting these most remarkable of fossil remains.…”