2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Developmental Implications of the Use of Reproductive Technologies for Transgender People: A Comparative Cross-Section Protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our last hypothesis that was no group of raters would be able to differentiate the family drawings between children from transgender fathers conceived by DSI and NC children was validated by our results. Here, the quasi-experimental design based on children’s family drawings investigated whether cues not captured by the questionnaire could be seen by blind raters [ 17 ]. Neither the child and family psychoanalysts’ group nor the four other groups of raters were able to differentiate the family drawings of children of trans-fathers from those of children in the NC group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our last hypothesis that was no group of raters would be able to differentiate the family drawings between children from transgender fathers conceived by DSI and NC children was validated by our results. Here, the quasi-experimental design based on children’s family drawings investigated whether cues not captured by the questionnaire could be seen by blind raters [ 17 ]. Neither the child and family psychoanalysts’ group nor the four other groups of raters were able to differentiate the family drawings of children of trans-fathers from those of children in the NC group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation day began with a family interview with a mental health professional using a semi-structured interview. The study explored several dimensions [17]. In order to test our first two hypotheses, we used respectively: (1) for cognitive development, an adapted rating according to age: for those 2 to 30 months of age, we used the Brunet-Lézine psychomotor development scale [21], which estimates a Developmental Quotient (DQ) based on the normative data available for 2-year-old French toddlers; for those 30 months to 6 years of age, the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Intelligence Scale for Children-third edition (WPPSI-3) [22], which is a standardized developmental test for preschool-age children that measures intelligence skills; and for those 7 years of age and older, we used the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-fourth edition (WISC-4) [23], which is a standardized developmental test for school-age children that measures intelligence skills.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many argue that having a transgender parent could have consequences in terms of parent-child relationship and family dynamics [16]. To address this issue, we used the Five-Minute Speech Sample (FMSS) [17,18], which is an instrument assessing the emotional climate within the family through attitudes and feelings expressed by a parent towards his/her child and termed expressed emotions. In addition, we developed a quasi-experimental design based on children’s family drawings to investigate whether cues not captured by the questionnaire could be seen by blind raters [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%