2015
DOI: 10.1080/2159256x.2015.1119926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The devil is in the details: Transposable element analysis of the Tasmanian devil genome

Abstract: The third marsupial genome was sequenced from the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii), a species that currently is driven to extinction by a rare transmissible cancer. The transposable element (TE) landscape of the Tasmanian devil genome revealed that the main driver of retrotransposition the Long INterspersed Element 1 (LINE1) seem to have become inactivated during the past 12 million years. Strangely, the Short INterspersed Elements (SINE), that normally hijacks the LINE1 retrotransposition system, became… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the limited number of retrocompetent elements, retrotransposition of LINEs and/or SINEs persists in mouse, human, and most other mammal genomes examined to date. TE quiescence of LINEs and/or SINES has only been observed in the ground squirrel (Platt II and Ray 2012 ), Tasmanian devil (Nilsson 2016 ), Ateles spider monkeys (Boissinot et al 2004 ), sigmodontine rodents (Grahn et al 2005 ; Rinehart et al 2005 ), and pteropodid bats (Cantrell et al 2008 ) but, given the timing and phylogenetic distribution of these silencing events, it is plausible that quiescence has impacted in as many as 15% of all mammal species (Platt II and Ray 2012 ). Understanding the genomic mechanisms, population genetic parameters, and random factors that reduce or eliminate TE activity is one of the major questions in vertebrate genome evolution (Goodier 2016 ).…”
Section: Mammalian Te Content and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the limited number of retrocompetent elements, retrotransposition of LINEs and/or SINEs persists in mouse, human, and most other mammal genomes examined to date. TE quiescence of LINEs and/or SINES has only been observed in the ground squirrel (Platt II and Ray 2012 ), Tasmanian devil (Nilsson 2016 ), Ateles spider monkeys (Boissinot et al 2004 ), sigmodontine rodents (Grahn et al 2005 ; Rinehart et al 2005 ), and pteropodid bats (Cantrell et al 2008 ) but, given the timing and phylogenetic distribution of these silencing events, it is plausible that quiescence has impacted in as many as 15% of all mammal species (Platt II and Ray 2012 ). Understanding the genomic mechanisms, population genetic parameters, and random factors that reduce or eliminate TE activity is one of the major questions in vertebrate genome evolution (Goodier 2016 ).…”
Section: Mammalian Te Content and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2011; Nilsson et al. 2012; Nilsson 2016). As with other therians, large fractions of TEs correspond to non-LTR elements, such as LINEs and SINEs, including a high fraction of RTEs that are widely distributed across all marsupial orders (Gentles et al.…”
Section: Te Patterns In the Major Vertebrate Lineagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013). SINE activity is thought to have ceased before the radiation of the Dasyuridae (marsupial mice, quolls, and Tasmanian devils) ∼30 Mya, followed by L1 extinction in the lineage of the Tasmanian devil (but see Nilsson, 2016, for further comments). The opossum however, harbors transcriptionally active L1 and SINEs (Gu et al.…”
Section: Te Patterns In the Major Vertebrate Lineagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016). The repetitive nature of TE sequences, in combination with short-read sequencing technologies, exacerbates the correct assembly of TEs, especially for TE families exhibiting high sequence identity, high copy number or complex genomic arrangements (Nilsson 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fungi, 0-30% of the genome consists of transposable elements, with LTR (Long Terminal Repeats)-retrotransposons usually representing the largest fraction (Castanera et al 2016). The repetitive nature of TE sequences, in combination with short-read sequencing technologies, exacerbates the correct assembly of TEs, especially for TE families exhibiting high sequence identity, high copy number or complex genomic arrangements (Nilsson 2016).…”
Section: Transposable Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%