The diachronic account of attentional selectivity

Abstract

Many models of attention assume that attentional selection takes place at a specific moment in time which demarcates the critical transition from pre-attentive to attentive processing of sensory input. We argue that this intuitively appealing “synchronic” account is not only inaccurate, but has led to substantial conceptual confusion. As an alternative, we offer a “diachronic” framework that describes attentional selectivity as a process that unfolds over time. Key to this view is the concept of attentional episodes, brief periods of intense attentional amplification of sensory representations that regulate access to working memory and response-related processes. We describe how attentional episodes are linked to earlier attentional mechanisms and to recurrent processing at the neural level. We review studies that establish the existence of attentional episodes, delineate the factors that determine if and when they are triggered, and discuss the costs associated with processing multiple events within a single episode. Finally, we argue that this framework offers new solutions to old problems in attention research that have never been resolved. It can provide a unified and conceptually coherent account of the network of cognitive and neural processes that produce the goal-directed selectivity in perceptual processing that is commonly referred to as “attention”.

The number of expected targets modulates access to working memory: A new unified account of lag-1 sparing and distractor intrusions.

“…The fact that quantity expectations affect WM encoding in RSVP streams regardless of whether these streams contain just a single or two target items, as shown by our results, also implies that lag-1 sparing and distractor intrusions are essentially two expressions of the same mechanism, even though they appear to represent opposite effects (one reflects a performance benefit whereas the other reflects an error). This is conceptually important, because it opens up the possibility of developing a unified account of these two phenomena, thus integrating research on the attentional blink and on distractor intrusions, which has so far been pursued largely independently (see also Zivony & Eimer, 2021b, for an outline of such an integrative model).…”