1996
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diagnoses of patients admitted with acute chest pain but without myocardial infarction

Abstract: The high risk subset of a non-acute myocardial infarction population can be identified by means of a clinical evaluation and non-invasive cardiac examinations. Among the remainder, pulmonary embolism, gastro-oesophageal diseases and chest-wall syndromes should be paid special attention. A careful physical examination of the chest wall and upper endoscopy seems to be the most cost-beneficial examination to employ in this subset.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
72
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies that investigated patients with non-cardiac chest pain in secondary care using oesophageal endoscopy and pH monitoring have reported the oesophagus to be a potential origin of non-cardiac chest pain in up to two-thirds of patients, with GORD being the most likely cause. [18][19][20][21] A study in UK primary care reported that IHD was ruled out in half of all patients consulting with chest pain, and that the chest pain had an oesophageal origin in 10% of patients. 22 Similarly, in this study it was found that 10% of patients with non-specific chest pain reported gastrointestinal complaints such as GORD, dyspepsia, or peptic disease during the year preceding the index date, and that 3% of patients with non-specific chest pain had previously received a GORD diagnosis.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies that investigated patients with non-cardiac chest pain in secondary care using oesophageal endoscopy and pH monitoring have reported the oesophagus to be a potential origin of non-cardiac chest pain in up to two-thirds of patients, with GORD being the most likely cause. [18][19][20][21] A study in UK primary care reported that IHD was ruled out in half of all patients consulting with chest pain, and that the chest pain had an oesophageal origin in 10% of patients. 22 Similarly, in this study it was found that 10% of patients with non-specific chest pain reported gastrointestinal complaints such as GORD, dyspepsia, or peptic disease during the year preceding the index date, and that 3% of patients with non-specific chest pain had previously received a GORD diagnosis.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clinical symptoms may be vague, opening a broad differential diagnosis including pneumothorax, acute aortic or coronary syndromes, musculoskeletal and gastrointestinal disorders, and psychiatric conditions. Esophageal diseases are a common cause of chest discomfort and occur in more than one third of patients with excluded acute coronary syndrome (5). Daily reflux symptoms are reported in 4 to 7% of the population and about 2% suffer from esophagitis (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another 50% of acute chest pain admissions are for non-cardiac-related reasons 7 ; and in acute chest pain clinics, musculoskeletal chest pain accounts for between 5% and 20% of total visits. [8][9][10] Chest pain of a serious cardiovascular concern, for example, myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome, is seen less often in the primary care setting than in the emergency care setting. 11 Chest pain presentations in chiropractic clinics may be of a musculoskeletal origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%