1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1981.tb03230.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diagnosis and Management of Acute Scrotal Conditions in Boys

Abstract: Summary— In a consecutive series of 69 boys with an acute scrotal condition, 55% were suffering from torsion of a testicular appendage, 22% from torsion of the testis and the remainder from idiopathic scrotal oedema or epididymitis. The general clinical features and specific scrotal findings in each of these conditions are compared and contrasted. It is concluded that on clinical grounds alone, torsion of the testis can be excluded in many boys presenting with an acute scrotal condition. The implications for m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kadish and Bolte did not find such symptoms helpful, 5 but noted that boys with testicular torsion tend to present after a shorter duration of symptoms 5 . This finding has been reported by other investigators 3,8–10 and is also seen in the present review, as is the observation that the average age of boys with testicular torsion is greater than that of boys with torsion of a testicular appendage (14.4 years, 7 14 years 5 and 11–17 years 6 compared to 9.4 years, 7 10 years 5 and 8–12 years 6 ). Despite such observations, the history and clinical features cannot be relied upon to differentiate testicular torsion from other diagnoses in the individual.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Kadish and Bolte did not find such symptoms helpful, 5 but noted that boys with testicular torsion tend to present after a shorter duration of symptoms 5 . This finding has been reported by other investigators 3,8–10 and is also seen in the present review, as is the observation that the average age of boys with testicular torsion is greater than that of boys with torsion of a testicular appendage (14.4 years, 7 14 years 5 and 11–17 years 6 compared to 9.4 years, 7 10 years 5 and 8–12 years 6 ). Despite such observations, the history and clinical features cannot be relied upon to differentiate testicular torsion from other diagnoses in the individual.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A high index of suspicion should not be discouraged however, as it prompts a request for surgical review. In some children surgical exploration is required to exclude testicular torsion, but the diagnosis can be excluded in more than 50% of cases from the history and examination when they are performed by an experienced examiner 3 3 and the findings of the present study would support this.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Salvageability largely depends on the duration of pain at presentation [1] , and in our series the average duration was 2.6 h when the testis was salvaged and 48 h when the testis had to be removed. Some degree of testicular atrophy is inevitable when pain is present for more than 8-12 h [20] and when pain is present for more than 24 h, testicular salvageability is very low [21] . Therefore, even in equivocal cases, early exploration is necessary to prevent testicular loss, and negative explorations are acceptable [14] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%