1972
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1972.01620060029005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diagnostic Significance of the Minimal Erythema Dose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is often referred to in terms of minimal erythemal dose (MED), with little or no reference to the actual dose received. Stern and Urbach 8 stated that ‘it is not always clear whether “minimal” refers to the shade of erythema produced or to the least amount in energy in one of a series of increasing doses that produces erythema’. Stern and Urbach 8 subsequently commented that variables such as time to generate MED or the spectral output of the light source used were rarely mentioned.…”
Section: Ultraviolet Light Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this is often referred to in terms of minimal erythemal dose (MED), with little or no reference to the actual dose received. Stern and Urbach 8 stated that ‘it is not always clear whether “minimal” refers to the shade of erythema produced or to the least amount in energy in one of a series of increasing doses that produces erythema’. Stern and Urbach 8 subsequently commented that variables such as time to generate MED or the spectral output of the light source used were rarely mentioned.…”
Section: Ultraviolet Light Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stern and Urbach 8 stated that ‘it is not always clear whether “minimal” refers to the shade of erythema produced or to the least amount in energy in one of a series of increasing doses that produces erythema’. Stern and Urbach 8 subsequently commented that variables such as time to generate MED or the spectral output of the light source used were rarely mentioned. Recent publications have begun to correct these oversights, thus allowing easier comparison between different investigations.…”
Section: Ultraviolet Light Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty‐four hours after the application, UVB irradiation (1·5 minimal erythema dose, MED) was carried out (upper back). The MED was determined individually 24 h before irradiation by standard methods 8 . Erythema suppression was measured at 8, 24 and 48 h after UVB irradiation by visual scoring (upper back).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In UV studies, an individual's MED is determined by exposing the skin to graded doses of UV radiation, and the lowest dose resulting in uniform erythema is considered the MED. In a study population, there is a wide distribution of the dose of UV resulting in an MED [30] . An individual's MED can then be used in the subsequent challenge to evaluate the activity of topical anti-infl ammatory agents [31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%