2011
DOI: 10.1159/000334525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diagnostic Value of Controlled Oral Word Association Test-FAS and Category Fluency in Single-Domain Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

Abstract: Background: Recent studies have shown that decreases in both letter fluency and category fluency may be present in addition to memory impairment in single-domain amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). However, the clinical utility of these fluency measures is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine what, if any, diagnostic value letter and category fluency provide in differentiating single-domain aMCI from normal cognition. Methods: Data from 66 individuals [33 cognitively normal (CN) and 33 aMCI] … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A study on 96 athletes suffering from a sport-related concussion did not reveal significant difference with controls [33], but in mild cognitive impairment (preclinical stage of AD), impairment was seen compared to controls [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A study on 96 athletes suffering from a sport-related concussion did not reveal significant difference with controls [33], but in mild cognitive impairment (preclinical stage of AD), impairment was seen compared to controls [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The so-called “single-domain” aMCI patients should have intact EF. However, as shown in some recent studies [13,14], clinically diagnosed single-domain aMCI patients exhibited significant EF deficits when they performed some special EF tasks that were not included in the routine clinical neuropsychological assessment. As this study only concerned with EF of aMCI patients and the sample size was small, we did not classify the aMCI patients into single-domain and multiple-domain subtype groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas COWAT is known to reflect frontal lobe function, no sufficient consensus has yet been developed as to the specific interpretation or neuroanatomical correlates. 57 Taking such a difference into consideration, we analyzed the Stroop Test and COWAT individually, and found that the Stroop Test was of borderline significance level, while the COWAT was significant. We could presume the reason for such a difference is that the 2 tests exert different effects on general intelligence, autonomic instability, neuroanatomical change, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%