2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diagnostic Value of Exfoliative Cytology vs Histopathology for Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other technologies that can be used to identify OSSN in the setting of coexistent ocular pathology include exfoliative cell cytology [30,31], papanicolau [32], impression cytology [3335]), in vivo staining [36,37], and in vivo confocal microscopy [3841]. While all can play a role in the diagnosis of OSSN, HR-OCT stands out with several advantages in that it is noninvasive, easily scans the entire ocular surface, and requires minimal operator training and no need for laboratory processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other technologies that can be used to identify OSSN in the setting of coexistent ocular pathology include exfoliative cell cytology [30,31], papanicolau [32], impression cytology [3335]), in vivo staining [36,37], and in vivo confocal microscopy [3841]. While all can play a role in the diagnosis of OSSN, HR-OCT stands out with several advantages in that it is noninvasive, easily scans the entire ocular surface, and requires minimal operator training and no need for laboratory processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Careful preparation and immediate analysis after tissue sampling are crucial for obtaining reliable results. [83] In vivo confocal microscopy[84,85] is another way to morphologically assess individual cells for dysplasia or neoplasia, but its use requires substantial technical expertise. The efficacy of confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of OSSN has been variable, and discerning neoplasia on confocal microscopy is challenging.…”
Section: Diagnostic Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean accuracies of clinical and pathologic diagnosis were 0.84 and 0.98, respectively 13,15,16,27,38,40,45 . The risk of positive margins following excision was estimated at 0.42 13,15,27,34,45,48 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%