2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound of the Rectus Femoris for the diagnosis of Sarcopenia in adults: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasound is a technique that brings information about the muscle structure, using, for example, the pennation angle, or the muscle composition, such as intramuscular adipose tissue infiltration or ecogenicity [6,10]. Moreover, according to two systematic reviews, ultrasound is a technique with high methodological heterogeneity [12,13]. A standardized protocol for ultrasound that focuses on the patient's position, the ultrasound probe used, and the muscular parameters assessed is necessary [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ultrasound is a technique that brings information about the muscle structure, using, for example, the pennation angle, or the muscle composition, such as intramuscular adipose tissue infiltration or ecogenicity [6,10]. Moreover, according to two systematic reviews, ultrasound is a technique with high methodological heterogeneity [12,13]. A standardized protocol for ultrasound that focuses on the patient's position, the ultrasound probe used, and the muscular parameters assessed is necessary [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, unlike muscle mass quantity, currently, no validated cut-off points for muscle mass quality parameters are defined [6]. In this context, there is a need to identify new valid and clear cut-off points for sarcopenia diagnosis, considering that goldstandard techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography are not feasible to use in clinical practice [12,13]. Thus, considering the current limitations for the sarcopenia diagnosis and highlighting that sarcopenia could be underdiagnosed in community-dwelling older adults according to the current criteria, the identification of new cut-off points for the muscle mass quantity and quality parameters and the incorporation of them in the sarcopenia assessment could improve the sarcopenia diagnosis in the clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nies et al 28 reported a systematic review on TMT assessed using ultrasonography for sarcopenia. Most related studies used the supine position, and included 90 flexion and recumbent positions, with cutoffs ranging from 1.43 to 1.88 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the reported sensitivities need to be higher to accurately and meaningfully use US in a clinical setting. [ 92 ] Although US shows a potential role in the evaluation of sarcopenia in clinical practice, the lack of standardized reference values stalls its routine use unless gender and ethnicity-specific normative data is available. [ 93 ] Studies from different regions are inconsistent; with significant gender differences as well as community and clinical practice settings.…”
Section: H Ow To P Erform Us?mentioning
confidence: 99%