2013
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diagnostic Yield of Cardiac Catheterization in Low-Risk Troponinemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The portion of patients evidencing high-grade coronary stenosis and undergoing revascularization accounted for 38.6%. Comparison to the data obtained by Stripe et al 26 in a non-AECOPD cohort with mild troponin elevation (11% and 8.6% of patients had IHD and underwent revascularization, respectively) implies that troponinemia in AECOPD, when compared with troponinemia in a non-AECOPD setting, is a stronger indicator for coronary processes. Data comparison based upon the patient’s history of IHD revealed no statistically significant intercohortal difference in the need for revascularization: 8/15 patients (53.3%) with and 26/73 patients (35.6%) without a prior history of IHD, respectively, received coronary intervention ( P =0.20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The portion of patients evidencing high-grade coronary stenosis and undergoing revascularization accounted for 38.6%. Comparison to the data obtained by Stripe et al 26 in a non-AECOPD cohort with mild troponin elevation (11% and 8.6% of patients had IHD and underwent revascularization, respectively) implies that troponinemia in AECOPD, when compared with troponinemia in a non-AECOPD setting, is a stronger indicator for coronary processes. Data comparison based upon the patient’s history of IHD revealed no statistically significant intercohortal difference in the need for revascularization: 8/15 patients (53.3%) with and 26/73 patients (35.6%) without a prior history of IHD, respectively, received coronary intervention ( P =0.20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…5 Troponinaemia, classically considered as an unimportant alteration once an acute coronary disease has been ruled out, requires patient's follow-up and study to find the causes that generate myocardial suffering. 6,7 For instance, values of cTnT greater than 30 ng/L may indicate demand ischaemia in the context of other serious pathologies (eg heart failure, pulmonary embolism, major trauma, kidney failure, sepsis, shock, ischaemic stroke). 8,9 In the prehospital care context, values of cTnT ≥50 ng/L correlate with a worse prognosis, regardless of the final diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 - 38 An analysis of myocardial injury of emergency department patients showed that a fluid overload/heart failure scenario was the most common etiology. 39 Fluid overload is extremely common postoperatively, and preoperative left ventricular diastolic dysfunction has been strongly associated with postoperative myocardial injury. 40 Recent investigations using blood samples from the VISION 32 and METS 25 cohorts suggest myocardial injury has an inflammatory etiology.…”
Section: Asymptomatic Pulmonary Embolism Is Common and Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 -38 Une analyse des lésions myocardiques des patients du département des urgences a montré qu'un scénario de surcharge liquidienne/ d'insuffisance cardiaque était l'étiologie la plus fréquente. 39 La surcharge liquidienne est extrêmement fréquente en période postopératoire, et la dysfonction diastolique ventriculaire gauche préopératoire a montré une association forte avec les lésions myocardiques postopératoires. 40 Des recherches récentes utilisant des échantillons de sang des cohortes des études VISION 32 et METS 25 suggèrent que la lésion myocardique aurait une étiologie inflammatoire.…”
Section: Valeur Pronostique Des Lésions Myocardiques Postopératoiresunclassified