2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diagnostic Yield of Next Generation Sequencing in Inherited Retinal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36,37 Our findings highlighted several knowledge gaps in primary eye care, including awareness of genetic testing outcomes, as only 20% of optometrists knew that approximately 1 in 3 ocular genetic tests may return an inconclusive result; practical considerations (cost, ways to access, impact on health and medical insurance); and knowledge of gene therapy clinical trial results to date. In this study, we considered 1 in 3 ocular genetic tests being inconclusive as the correct answer to reflect the approximate number of cases in whom a candidate pathogenic variant can be identified as being causative of their IRD, based on data from next generation sequencing studies 11 and Australian IRD registries. 12,38 However, in practice, the interpretation of genetic testing results is complex, often requiring additional testing (e.g., to determine phase or to evaluate additional variants) and multidisciplinary team input.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36,37 Our findings highlighted several knowledge gaps in primary eye care, including awareness of genetic testing outcomes, as only 20% of optometrists knew that approximately 1 in 3 ocular genetic tests may return an inconclusive result; practical considerations (cost, ways to access, impact on health and medical insurance); and knowledge of gene therapy clinical trial results to date. In this study, we considered 1 in 3 ocular genetic tests being inconclusive as the correct answer to reflect the approximate number of cases in whom a candidate pathogenic variant can be identified as being causative of their IRD, based on data from next generation sequencing studies 11 and Australian IRD registries. 12,38 However, in practice, the interpretation of genetic testing results is complex, often requiring additional testing (e.g., to determine phase or to evaluate additional variants) and multidisciplinary team input.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uptake of IRD genetic testing in Australian private ophthalmology clinics is currently estimated to be around 10%, reflecting historic management patterns and access to genetic services 10 . Currently, the likelihood that a genetic test will provide an IRD diagnosis is approximately 60% 11 . However, with the increasing availability of sponsored genetic testing programs, 12–14 it's likely that diagnostic genetic testing will be available to more patients with retinal diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, the cost per positive diagnosis would be approximately 734 USD considering our diagnostic yield of 62%. When taking into account a high diagnostic yield of 80% for inherited dystrophies (23), the cost would be 659.11 USD. The more expertise gained, the lower the nal cost and the greater the test's clinical utility over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Without predefined guidelines, variant interpretation can differ substantially between institutes, which may contribute to the variability in genetic interpretation of a given variant. 19 Japan has a different genetic architecture of IRD compared to Western countries and even neighboring countries, 14 20 21 leading the Japanese Retina and Vitreous Society to publish a modified set of guidelines, the Japanese inherited retinal dystrophy variant interpretation (J-IRD-VI) guidelines. These guidelines are built upon predefined ACMG/AMP rules based on a thorough discussion among the expert members of key genetic laboratories and allow a uniform interpretation of variants tailored specifically for Japanese patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%