1994
DOI: 10.2307/1423005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dialogical Self: Meaning as Movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These stories "not only govern which meanings are attributed to events, but also select which events are included and which are left out of the story" (Polkinghorne, 2004, p. 58). As these specific interpretations can narrow people's understanding of themselves and the world around them, some self-narratives may become dysfunctional and inflexible (Dimaggio, 2006;Hermans & Kempen, 1993). As suggested by White and Epston (1990), maintenance of these dominant narratives may confine all experiences into a problematic self-narrative, which becomes biased toward the negative details of the experience (Gonçalves & Machado, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stories "not only govern which meanings are attributed to events, but also select which events are included and which are left out of the story" (Polkinghorne, 2004, p. 58). As these specific interpretations can narrow people's understanding of themselves and the world around them, some self-narratives may become dysfunctional and inflexible (Dimaggio, 2006;Hermans & Kempen, 1993). As suggested by White and Epston (1990), maintenance of these dominant narratives may confine all experiences into a problematic self-narrative, which becomes biased toward the negative details of the experience (Gonçalves & Machado, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our prospective understanding of a Cultural Psychology of Religion draws inspiration from theoretical work developed by sociocultural psychology on the structure and dynamics of sign use or semiotically mediated action, specially some research based on the fruitful rediscovery of C. S. Peirce, J. M. Baldwin, G. H. Mead, L. S. Vygotsky, and M. M. Bakhtin's works (e.g., Hermans & Hermans-Konopka, 2010;Hermans & Kempen, 1993;Valsiner, 2007;Valsiner & Rosa, 2007;Wertsch, 1991Wertsch, , 1998Wertsch, , 2002Wertsch, , 2009, and from micro-sociological and anthropological research attentive to the fusion between semiotic practices and the production of selfhood (e.g., among other, Goffman, 1959Goffman, , 1961Tomkins, 1987;Turner, 1975Turner, , 1995Turner & Turner, 1995).…”
Section: Selfhood As Meaning-creation: Drama Myth and Poiesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been shown in a study of the development of conscious wishes and of feelings of duty during the course of adult life (Frenkel-Brunswik, 1939, p. 417, emphasis added) The question that needed to be answered, and by in large was not at the time, was whether, pending deeper scrutiny, individuals were able to account for the ignored dimension of their personality. In our time, years later, this leads gently into modern dialogical approaches to the self (Hermans, 2001;Hermans, 1995;Hermans & Kempen, 1993;Ferreira, Salgado & Cunha, this Issue) where opposition is, indeed, a powerful basis for transformation of the structure of Ipositions. One of the possible transformations of the structure of I-positions is a fixed structure that was evident in the data of Adorno et al (1950).…”
Section: Reality and Auto-illusionmentioning
confidence: 99%