2021
DOI: 10.35808/ersj/2122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dichotomy of Procedural and Distributive Justice in the Theory of Social Choice

Abstract: Purpose:The purpose of the article is to provide critical analysis regarding the application of distributive justice in the theory of social choice. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research combines the elements of critical analysis and synthesis utilizing a rich scope of inter-disciplinary evidence. Findings: Distributive justice serves as the dominant concept in economics, at the same time being hardly competitive with the principles of social sustainability. Practical Implications: Social choice framework … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inclusiveness, in relational terms, underscores the notion of justice encompassing Fraser's (1998) triad of (re)distribution, participation and recognition. Justice perspectives encompass the fairness of resource allocation and distributive outcomes, as well as the fairness of the processes underlying distribution of resources, thereby establishing procedural and distributive aspects of justice as vital (Noll & Murdock, 2020;Okhrimenko, 2021). For our analytical framework, we selected the procedural justice principles of interdependency and refutability, and the distributive justice principles of need and equity.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusiveness, in relational terms, underscores the notion of justice encompassing Fraser's (1998) triad of (re)distribution, participation and recognition. Justice perspectives encompass the fairness of resource allocation and distributive outcomes, as well as the fairness of the processes underlying distribution of resources, thereby establishing procedural and distributive aspects of justice as vital (Noll & Murdock, 2020;Okhrimenko, 2021). For our analytical framework, we selected the procedural justice principles of interdependency and refutability, and the distributive justice principles of need and equity.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%