2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-017-3131-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The difference between a rock and a biological hard place: epibionts in the rocky intertidal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several hosts have evolved chemical, physical, or other bio-mediated defence systems to protect themselves from epibiotic attachment 1,43,44 . Therefore, many adherent organisms are generalists that do not have epibiotic relations or host specificity 45 . In order for adherent organisms to acquire host specificity, they may need to provide positive or neutral effects for the host 46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several hosts have evolved chemical, physical, or other bio-mediated defence systems to protect themselves from epibiotic attachment 1,43,44 . Therefore, many adherent organisms are generalists that do not have epibiotic relations or host specificity 45 . In order for adherent organisms to acquire host specificity, they may need to provide positive or neutral effects for the host 46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, growing on snail shells may allow P. conchopheria to escape from predation by grazers. It is also possible that algae that grown on snail shells can escape desiccation through the mobility of the hosts (McGowan & Iyengar, ). Therefore, further studies are required to test these hypotheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics shown relate only to such communities, but these can be vitally important for understanding general ecological theory (Connell ). Particularly when small calcareous domiciles are counted as components of larger species assemblages, domicile abundances are commonly reported without information on whether any were dead and what the proportion may be (Clark et al , McGowan and Iyengar , Krzemińska and Kuklinski , Smith et al , Traiger and Konar , among other recent examples). The diagram shows the ecological processes (R = recruitment, M = mortality, T = taphonomic degradation) that may be considered to cause a hypothetical distributional pattern of differing density of domicile structures, depending on whether information is known about the status of occupancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%