2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1809955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Difference Indifference Makes in Strategy-Proof Allocation of Objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, those rules are not efficient 12 (and therefore, the rules proposed by Alcalde-Unzu and Molis (2011) and Jaramillo and Manjunath (2012) are not competitive) as the following example shows:…”
Section: Top Trading With Fixed Tie-breakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of course, those rules are not efficient 12 (and therefore, the rules proposed by Alcalde-Unzu and Molis (2011) and Jaramillo and Manjunath (2012) are not competitive) as the following example shows:…”
Section: Top Trading With Fixed Tie-breakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent and important contributions by Alcalde-Unzu and Molis (2011) and Jaramillo and Manjunath (2012) propose two distinct families of rules satisfying individual rationality, strategyproofness, and efficiency when indifferences are allowed. However, a foundation of the set of rules satisfying individual rationality, strategy-proofness, and efficiency is missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that since every type contains a indifference set, the space of valuations (v t i (a)) a∈A : t i ∈ T I is a strict subset of R |A| + when |A| ≥ 5. 13 12 Jaramillo and Manjunath [18] study the consequences of accommodating indifference sets in the assignment problem of indivisible objects without money. 13 Here we use the fact that the indifference set of every type contains two or more alternatives.…”
Section: Discrete Public Projects With Indifference Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not the case when indifferences are allowed and/or there are feasibility constraints [1,10,16]. For general assignments problems with non-empty strict core, Sönmez [36] shows that there are rules that satisfy individual rationality, (constrained) efficiency, and strategy-proofness only if the strict core is unique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%