2011
DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.20063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The differences between hard and soft skills and their relative impact on training transfer

Abstract: Most research and conceptualizing of training transfer assumes that the content of the training is irrelevant in whether or not or to what extent transfer is

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
288
0
24

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(322 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
288
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, both team and individuals' performance is examined, scrutinized and continuously developed in order to increase overall staff effectivity. Hard factors such as routines, training exercises and procedures have traditionally been focused upon for military performance development; however, an increased interest on soft factors such as leadership styles, interpersonal skills, social effectivity and personality has become increasingly important (Blass & Ferris, 2007;Bartone, Eid, Johnsen, Larberg, & Snook, 2009;Laker & Powell, 2011;Ohlsson, Hedlund, & Larsson, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, both team and individuals' performance is examined, scrutinized and continuously developed in order to increase overall staff effectivity. Hard factors such as routines, training exercises and procedures have traditionally been focused upon for military performance development; however, an increased interest on soft factors such as leadership styles, interpersonal skills, social effectivity and personality has become increasingly important (Blass & Ferris, 2007;Bartone, Eid, Johnsen, Larberg, & Snook, 2009;Laker & Powell, 2011;Ohlsson, Hedlund, & Larsson, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus has been on both input and output factors in which the transfer of training is defined as "the extent to which, what is learned in training is applied on the job and enhances job related performance" (Laker & Powell, 2011). Input factors tend to focus on elements such as trainee characteristics, training design, and the working environment.…”
Section: The Transfer Of Training -Evidence To Datementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although organizations perceive soft skills as challenging to teach (Laker & Powell, 2011;von Stetten et al, 2014), they are increasingly in demand, difficult to recruit, and, therefore, require organization-internal development. Second, to train generation Y's talents, HRM needs to be able to consider not only organizational needs but also employees' desires.…”
Section: Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%