The differences in the quality of life  of allergic rhinitis and non-symptomatic individuals

Hutagaol, Ayu Betty; Adriztina, Indri

doi:10.32637/orli.v51i2.428

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…12 50% of the patients do not even know that the problem in their respiratory system is due to rhinitis. 13 The occurrence of more than one allergy, commonly referred as comorbid allergy, is critical to the diagnosis by clinicians. 14 Particularly, children, old-aged people, and adults who are suffering with other diseases are more vulnerable to allergic comorbidities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Explainable Knowledge-Based System Using Subjective Preferences and Objective Data for Ranking Decision Alternatives

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Allergy is a hypersensitive reaction that occurs when the allergen reacts with the immune system. The prevalence and severity of the allergies are uprising in South Asian countries. Allergy often occurs in combinations which becomes difficult for physicians to diagnose. Objectives This work aims to develop a decision-making model which aids physicians in diagnosing allergy comorbidities. The model intends to not only provide rational decisions, but also explainable knowledge about all alternatives. Methods The allergy data gathered from real-time sources contain a smaller number of samples for comorbidities. Decision-making model applies three sampling strategies, namely, ideal, single, and complete, to balance the data. Bayes theorem-based probabilistic approaches are used to extract knowledge from the balanced data. Preference weights for attributes with respect to alternatives are gathered from a group of domain-experts affiliated to different allergy testing centers. The weights are combined with objective knowledge to assign confidence values to alternatives. The system provides these values along with explanations to aid decision-makers in choosing an optimal decision. Results Metrics of explainability and user satisfaction are used to evaluate the effectiveness of the system in real-time diagnosis. Fleiss' Kappa statistic is 0.48, and hence the diagnosis of experts is said to be in moderate agreement. The decision-making model provides a maximum of 10 suitable and relevant pieces of evidence to explain a decision alternative. Clinicians have improved their diagnostic performance by 3% after using CDSS (77.93%) with a decrease in 20% of time taken. Conclusion The performance of less-experienced clinicians has improved with the support of an explainable decision-making model. The code for the framework with all intermediate results is available at https://github.com/kavya6697/Allergy-PT.git.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%