2014
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2014.977217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The differential effects of direct and indirect speech on discourse comprehension in Dutch and English listeners with and without aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the end of their research, they discovered that participants without aphasia performed better than those with aphasia; English speaking participants involved performed worse than Dutch participants, and direct speech contained in narratives were easier to understand than indirect speech. The current study differs from that of [12] based on it looking at the tone of aphasics. In this regard, it added more knowledge to that of [12].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the end of their research, they discovered that participants without aphasia performed better than those with aphasia; English speaking participants involved performed worse than Dutch participants, and direct speech contained in narratives were easier to understand than indirect speech. The current study differs from that of [12] based on it looking at the tone of aphasics. In this regard, it added more knowledge to that of [12].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The current study differs from that of [12] based on it looking at the tone of aphasics. In this regard, it added more knowledge to that of [12].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation