2006
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory.

Abstract: Self-determination theory research has demonstrated that intrinsic and identified self-regulations are associated with successful adaptation. However, few distinctions are typically made between these regulations and their outcomes. In the present studies, the associations between intrinsic and identified motivations and outcomes of psychological well-being and academic performance are compared in educational settings. In Study 1, intrinsic self-regulation predicted psychological well-being, independent of aca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
231
2
22

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(66 reference statements)
24
231
2
22
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, our model did not contain a significant path between intrinsic motivation and achievement although there was an indirect path via self-efficacy. Although past findings are inconsistent regarding the motivation-achievement relationship among adolescents (Baker 2003;Burton et al 2006), the lack of a significant relationship herein may be the result of our failure to account and control for other forms of motivation. Thus, future research is needed to examine the longitudinal relations among intrinsic motivation and academic achievement while controlling for other known predictors as well as baseline levels of these constructs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, our model did not contain a significant path between intrinsic motivation and achievement although there was an indirect path via self-efficacy. Although past findings are inconsistent regarding the motivation-achievement relationship among adolescents (Baker 2003;Burton et al 2006), the lack of a significant relationship herein may be the result of our failure to account and control for other forms of motivation. Thus, future research is needed to examine the longitudinal relations among intrinsic motivation and academic achievement while controlling for other known predictors as well as baseline levels of these constructs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…There is also evidence that more autonomous forms of regulation result in more positive learning experiences and higher achievement, for example, in science , psychology (Burton et al 2006), and French, mathematics, geography, and history . In contrast, external regulation, introjected regulation, and amotivation have been shown to result in negative outcomes such as poor school adjustment (Walls and Little 2005) and dropout (Vallerand, Fortier, and Guay 1997).…”
Section: Self-determination Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situations of low threat, satisfaction-based commitment may have a larger influence on RMRs, given that the context does not challenge the basis of such commitment. On the other hand, identification-based commitment, which reflects an individual's enduring values and beliefs (Burton, Lydon, D'Alessandro, & Koestner, 2006;Sheldon & Elliot, 1998), may be especially crucial to sustaining relationships in the face of adversity. Moreover, introjection and ought-based commitments may help keep relationships intact out of a sense of duty and obligation, but have a negative impact on well-being (Ryan & Connell, 1989), possibly by fostering resentment (Strauman & Higgins, 1988).…”
Section: Relationship-specific Identification and Relationship Commitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies document aspects of the SDT framework in educational contexts (e.g. see Table 1; Benware and Deci 1984;Burton et al 2006;Grolnick and Ryan 1987;Koestner et al 1984;Ryan and Grolnick 1986;Standage et al 2006;Tsai et al 2008). However, only few studies in this area have captured the hierarchical SDT model as a whole.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%