The Differential Effects of Online Word-of-Mouth and Critics’ Reviews on Pre-release Movie Evaluation

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the persuasive influences of online user comments (or word-of-mouth) and of the reviews by movie critics on moviegoers’ evaluation of to-be-released movies. Two distinctive features of this study are: (1) moviegoers are considered to be heterogeneous in their movie going frequency and (2) word-of-mouth and critical reviews are concurrently available, and the views expressed in the two messages are in conflict. Using three experiments with natural stimuli, we find that the persuasive effect of online word-of-mouth is stronger on infrequent than on frequent moviegoers, especially when it is negative (Study 1). The effect of negative word-of-mouth on infrequent moviegoers is enduring even in the presence of positive reviews by movie critics (Study 2). The relative influence of word-of-mouth and critical reviews are asymmetric with infrequent moviegoers more influenced by word-of-mouth, while frequent moviegoers more influenced by the reviews (Study 3). We validate this source–segment alignment through secondary data analysis.

Does Twitter matter? The impact of microblogging word of mouth on consumers’ adoption of new movies

“…Research on WOM has reported differential effects for positive and negative WOM, predominantly finding that negative WOM is more influential (e.g., Chakravarty, Liu, and Mazumdar 2010). If MWOM valence matters, does such a "negativity bias" also exist for MWOM?…”

Predicting online product sales via online reviews, sentiments, and promotion strategies

“…Furthermore, Ito et al (1998) have posited that positive information may not have a significant impact on evaluations in comparison to negative information. This is why in the decision-making process negative information ultimately trumps positive information in terms of influence A case study on how movies are evaluated based upon the type of e-UGC has shown that positive e-UGC has considerably less influence on end evaluations of the movies compared to negative e-UGC (Chakravarty et al, 2010). Individuals, particularly those that are not frequent moviegoers are still affected by negative e-UGC even in the presence of positive reviews given by movie critics (ibid.).…”

Physician Review Websites: Effects of the Proportion and Position of Negative Reviews on Readers’ Willingness to Choose the Doctor

“…One noticeable advance is that almost any Internet user can contribute content to many websites (Chakravarty, Liu, & Mazumdar, 2010;Walther & Jang, 2012). For example, the eBay (www.ebay.com) and Amazon (www.amazon.com) reputation systems allow a buyer to leave comments about the seller after a transaction.…”