Electro-Mechanical device complexity exists in everyday items from cell phones to automobiles to vacuum cleaners. Generally, product complexity is one of the least quantifiable characteristics in the design cycle with arguably some of the greatest implications. A high level of device complexity carries a negative connotation and is usually considered an attribute a designer should attempt to mitigate. Alternatively, a low level of device complexity may induce designers and marketers to question a product's usefulness. Whether complexity is a necessary aspect of a design or a hindrance needing to be minimized or eliminated, depends upon how complexity is framed. Some instances in literature attempt to measure complexity yet there is no unified measure that captures the complexity of a product or system during design phases or upon product/system realization. Complexity is defined in many ways, at different levels of abstraction, and different stages of design therefore, becoming highly contextual and subjective at best. An established and repeatable methodology for calculating complexity of existing products in the marketplace is necessary. Once a measure of complexity is agreed upon at the post design stage we can look to earlier phases in design to see whether insights are observable. Identifying complexity early in the design cycle is paramount to strategic resource allocation. This study considers the Generalized Complexity Index (GCI) measure put forth by Jacobs [1] and expands upon it to include functional modeling as a key component in determining an indicative complexity metric. Functional modeling is a method used to abstract system or product specifications to a general framework that represents a function based design solution. Complexity metrics are developed at the functional and completed design levels and used for comparison. Thirty common household products retrieved from an online design repository [2] as well as seven senior capstone design projects were evaluated using the GCI. A modification to the GCI equation is proposed and to gain a relative scale of complexity within the data, a ranked complexity metric was developed and utilized. The magnitude of the ranked complexity metric was only indicative of hierarchical status of a product within the data set and therefore is not comparable to GCI values. Though Jacobs GCI worked well in his study, the GCI does not represent a meaningful complexity measure when applied to the data in this study. This study is an initial attempt to apply an independent data set to Jacobs GCI model with perhaps greater implications, with respect to products, that complexity is multifaceted and is not accurately represented by only interconnectedness, multiplicity, and diversity.