“…The second factor is considered because the PMO architecture can be understood as being a result of "the battleground between empowerments and control, between people and processes, and between political factions" (Pellegrinelli and Garagna, 2009). Stakeholders' positions vary according to the support of senior management in the definition of the political space and report requirements of the PMO (Dai and Wells, 2004;Jalal and Koosha, 2015;Too and Weaver, 2014;Ward and Daniel, 2013), to project teams' activities to mitigate tensions between the teams and the PMO Barbalho, 2021), to relationships with project managers (Curlee, 2008;Unger et al, 2012), to the support of functional managers when acting as knowledge brokers (M€ uller et al, 2013a;Desouza and Evaristo, 2006), to the communication problems which PMOs can address (Jerbrant, 2014;Carvalho, 2014;D ıez and Mer e, 2016) and to the tension involving PMO costs Van Der Linde and Steyn, 2016). In general, each stakeholder has a different perception of project success and performance (Anantatmula and Rad, 2018).…”