1970
DOI: 10.1378/chest.58.6.566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Differential Response to Infection of Autogenous Vein versus Dacron Arterial Prosthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, its biological matrix can be remodeled by the body according to the needs of the environment. Third, the absence of synthetic material will preclude foreign body reaction, allow complete graft integration, limit graft infection, and may result in increased overall patency rates (14)(15)(16). In 1986, Weinberg and Bell (17) were the first to produce a completely biological TEBV from animal collagen gels and cultured bovine endothelial cells (ECs), smooth muscle cells (SMC), and fibroblasts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, its biological matrix can be remodeled by the body according to the needs of the environment. Third, the absence of synthetic material will preclude foreign body reaction, allow complete graft integration, limit graft infection, and may result in increased overall patency rates (14)(15)(16). In 1986, Weinberg and Bell (17) were the first to produce a completely biological TEBV from animal collagen gels and cultured bovine endothelial cells (ECs), smooth muscle cells (SMC), and fibroblasts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After more than 300 vascular graft implants with nonsterile SIS in dogs, we have never observed graft failure caused by infection, nor have we observed clinical evidence of infection. Although reports of human clinical studies attest to the relative resistance of biologic grafts (such as autogenous saphenous vein) to infection compared with synthetic graft materials, 5 we have taken special notice of the resistance of SIS considering the obvious nonsterile source of the material (small intestine) and the fact that we have not subjected the SIS to any form of sterilization, other than transient soaking in 10% neomycin-saline solution, before implantation. The incidence of vascular graft infections in human medicine has decreased from approximately 8% to less than 2% with the advent of perioperative antibiotic use,6'1l but the consequences of infection are catastrophic and life-threatening.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic vascular grafts, such as Dacron and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) are approximately four times more likely to become infected than autogenous saphenous vein grafts. 5 These synthetic materials provide a site to harbor bacteria once an infection is established. In contrast, biologic materials, particularly those that are associated with revascularization of an anatomic region, seem to provide a microenvironment that inhibits or discourages bacterial growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, vein grafts have been shown experimentally to have higher rates of necrosis than ePTFE when contaminated and they are susceptible to pseudoaneurysm formation and rupture. 18,19 An increasing body of literature regarding the use of prosthetic alternatives, particularly in the face of gastrointestinal contamination, has arisen, and ePTFE has been shown to be a viable option in some situations. 20 Although generally less pronounced in autogenous vein grafts, NH is known to be a significant long-term problem in both types of conduits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%