2012
DOI: 10.1177/0022466912458156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Differential Role of Classroom Working Alliance in Predicting School-Related Outcomes for Students With and Without High-Incidence Disabilities

Abstract: The accumulation of struggles for students with highincidence disabilities, such as learning disabilities (LD) and behavioral disorders (BD), makes it critical to understand the factors that enhance the positive adjustment of these students. Relationships with others can help to buffer the effects of stressful life events and promote positive adjustment (Werner & Smith, 1989), and a growing body of theoretical and empirical work suggests that teachers play a vital role in children's development (Murray & Piant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it has been found that children with severe emotional disturbances experience less affiliation and more dissatisfaction with teachers (Murray and Greenberg 2001), and encounter more negative and less positive peer interactions at school (Little and Kobak 2003) than children without disabilities. Likewise, children with behavior disorders collaborate less with their teachers (Toste et al 2012) and children with ADHD and behavior problems experience more peer rejection (Hinshaw and Melnick 1995) than children without disabilities. Similarly, social difficulties such as bullying and having less social support are also found among children with autism (Humphrey and Symes 2010;Russel et al 2012).…”
Section: Advancing Current Knowledge: Some Conceptual and Methodologimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been found that children with severe emotional disturbances experience less affiliation and more dissatisfaction with teachers (Murray and Greenberg 2001), and encounter more negative and less positive peer interactions at school (Little and Kobak 2003) than children without disabilities. Likewise, children with behavior disorders collaborate less with their teachers (Toste et al 2012) and children with ADHD and behavior problems experience more peer rejection (Hinshaw and Melnick 1995) than children without disabilities. Similarly, social difficulties such as bullying and having less social support are also found among children with autism (Humphrey and Symes 2010;Russel et al 2012).…”
Section: Advancing Current Knowledge: Some Conceptual and Methodologimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children with EBD develop more dissatisfaction in their teacherchild relationships (Murray & Greenberg, 2001), collaborate less with their teachers (Toste, Bloom, & Heath, 2014), and encounter more peer victimization (Little & Kobak, 2003) than children without EBD and these negative social experiences may in turn lead to poor classroom adjustment (Sabol & Pianta, 2012). These findings are especially important because children with EBD not only experience more negative interactions, they may also, in line with Belsky's (1997) differential susceptibility hypothesis, be more susceptible to positive and negative social interactions.…”
Section: Advancing Research On Classroom Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Wiener and Daniels (2016) investigated how adolescents with ADHD experience their schooling, broadly using grounded theory as a theoretical framework. Rogers et al (2015) investigated how ADHD symptomatology affects the STR, using the classroom working alliance model (Toste, Bloom, and Heath 2014), which is based on Bordin's therapeutic alliance theory.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Used In the Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%