1973
DOI: 10.5935/0305-7518.19730002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Differential Tuberculin Test in Leprosy

Abstract: The differential tuberculin test has been carried out on a group of leprosy patients using 5 different PPD antigens (S, Y, G, B and F) obtained from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other myco bacterial species. The patterns of sensitization seen in the leprosy patients were found to be different from those of the general po pulation and of tuberculous patients, but no marked differences in the patterns were seen between the patients with leprom atous and those with tuberculoid leprosy.In both groups of patients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1975
1975

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Somewhat similar studies carried out by Pinto, Arseculeratne & Welianga (1973) in Ceylon failed to demonstrate differences in response between the two immunological extremes of leprosy. However, they used PPD's of five species of mycobacteria, only one of which (M. fortuitum) was a fast growing species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Somewhat similar studies carried out by Pinto, Arseculeratne & Welianga (1973) in Ceylon failed to demonstrate differences in response between the two immunological extremes of leprosy. However, they used PPD's of five species of mycobacteria, only one of which (M. fortuitum) was a fast growing species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Another is to measure the amount of sensitization of populations to skin test reagents prepared from environmental mycobacteria (Ogunbi, 1969;Edwards et al 1969; Pinto, Arseculeratne, Uragoda & Hemawardene, 20-2 1972). A third is through the study of the reactions of patients with mycobacterial diseases (Pinto, Arseculeratne & Welianga, 1973;Pinto, Arseculeratne, Uragoda & Hemawardene, 1973;Stanford, Revill, Gunthorpe & Grange, 1975;Paul, Stanford & Carswell, 1975), and a fourth is through studies of susceptibility of animals to experimental infections. Most such studies have been limited by the use of bacterial isolation techniques that are inadvertently selective for certain species or by the use of P.P.D.s with specificities too low to be of value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%