2009
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0906075106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diffusion of maize to the southwestern United States and its impact

Abstract: Our understanding of the initial period of agriculture in the southwestern United States has been transformed by recent discoveries that establish the presence of maize there by 2100 cal. B.C. (calibrated calendrical years before the Christian era) and document the processes by which it was integrated into local foraging economies. Here we review archaeological, paleoecological, linguistic, and genetic data to evaluate the hypothesis that Proto-Uto-Aztecan (PUA) farmers migrating from a homeland in Mesoamerica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
96
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
6
96
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although maize was introduced to this area from the south by ∼2100 B.C. (18,21,27), birth rates as proxied by 15 (19,28,29), the low juvenility indices reported here favor suggestions that these occupations tended to be short-lived (30,31) or part of a seasonal round (27), and perhaps most important, because this also affects mobility, focused on varieties of maize that were not yet very productive (32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although maize was introduced to this area from the south by ∼2100 B.C. (18,21,27), birth rates as proxied by 15 (19,28,29), the low juvenility indices reported here favor suggestions that these occupations tended to be short-lived (30,31) or part of a seasonal round (27), and perhaps most important, because this also affects mobility, focused on varieties of maize that were not yet very productive (32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…B.C. (all dates are either calibrated calendrical years from 14 C or calendar years derived from tree rings), with first known appearances in the United States in southern Arizona and west central New Mexico (17,18). Despite legitimate expectations to the contrary (19)-and in contrast to the situation in Europe and the Near East-high values for the juvenility index in the Southwest greatly lagged the first appearance of cultigens, according to an earlier study calculated on 4,396 sets of human remains from 51 archaeological sites and composite samples (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach reported in this paper could be applied in the future to similar human spread phenomena (e.g., the Austronesian Neolithic expansion [60], preceramic dispersals of maize and root crops into Panama [61], the diffusion of maize to the southwestern United States [62], etc. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of the language family and its diversity as well as reconstructed Proto-Uto-Aztecan (PUA) vocabulary suggest a northern origin for UA somewhere in the Southwest or Southern California (2,(17)(18)(19)(20). Recently, Merrill et al (16) used linguistic data to support a PUA homeland in the Great Basin, which also provides additional support for a northern origin. In contrast, Hill (3) argued that UA originated in the vicinity of where maize was domesticated, perhaps in Central Mexico.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, recent phytolith data have pointed to an origin in the lowland tropics of Tabasco more than 7,000 YBP (14). Whereas the origin and timing of domestication continues to be debated in Mesoamerica, the introduction of maize into the Southwest before 4,000 YBP is no longer disputed (15,16). The early appearance of this cultigen in the Southwest, soon after its widespread use in Mesoamerica, has been used to support the hypothesis that maize cultivation spread with humans from Mesoamerica and therefore, was not spread primarily through cultural diffusion (3)(4)(5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%