1954
DOI: 10.1080/14786440608520473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diffusion of nitrogen in alpha iron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These calculations show excellent agreement with experimentally verifiable parameters, such as the migration energy barrier for C diffusion, where ab initio values of 0.86 eV 33,36 , 0.87 eV 37 and 0.90 eV 34 are in good agreement with the experimental value of 0.87 eV 2,38 . For N, an equally good agreement is seen for the migration barrier, where a value of 0.76 eV was found by ab initio calculations 34 and a value of 0.78 eV was found experimentally 39 . Calculations in austenite are, however, limited primarily to solute dissolution, diffusion and their influence on the electronic structure and local geometry 33,[40][41][42] although calculations of vacancy-C binding have been performed 43 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These calculations show excellent agreement with experimentally verifiable parameters, such as the migration energy barrier for C diffusion, where ab initio values of 0.86 eV 33,36 , 0.87 eV 37 and 0.90 eV 34 are in good agreement with the experimental value of 0.87 eV 2,38 . For N, an equally good agreement is seen for the migration barrier, where a value of 0.76 eV was found by ab initio calculations 34 and a value of 0.78 eV was found experimentally 39 . Calculations in austenite are, however, limited primarily to solute dissolution, diffusion and their influence on the electronic structure and local geometry 33,[40][41][42] although calculations of vacancy-C binding have been performed 43 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…For N, an equally good agreement is seen for the migration barrier, where a value of 0.76 eV was found by ab initio calculations 35 and a value of 0.78 eV was found experimentally. 40 Calculations in austenite are, however, limited primarily to solute dissolution, diffusion, and their influence on the electronic structure, local environment, and stacking fault energies, 34,[41][42][43][44][45][46] although calculations of vacancy-C binding have been performed. 47 In this work we present a detailed study of the energetics, kinetics, and interactions of He, C, and N solutes in model austenite and austenitic systems using DFT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 (c) shows the precipitates of γ′-Fe 4 N obtained from a 220 spot of γ′ iron nitride (shown as a white circle in the SADP). According to the Fe-N diagram, the ε-Fe 2-3 N formed in nitriding would decompose during furnace cooling to the γ′-Fe 4 N precipitates with lamellar structure presenting an (0001) ε //(111) γ′ , [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] γ′ // [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] ε orientation relationship of ε-Fe 2-3 N with γ′-Fe 4 N [35,36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nitriding treatment is based upon nitrogen diffusion in the ferrite matrix [9][10][11][12][13][14]. For the optimization of the nitriding, one should know the behavior of alloying elements in relation to the precipitation phenomenon and the effects on hardness and residual stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%