2009
DOI: 10.1108/00012530910973776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The digital native – myth and reality

Abstract: Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to develop and promote a realistic understanding of young people and digital technology with a view to supporting information professionals in playing useful and meaningful roles in supporting current generations of young people. In particular the paper aims to offer a critical perspective on popular and political understandings of young people and digital technologiescharacterised by notions of "digital natives", the "net generation" and other commonsense portrayals of exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
280
0
81

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 519 publications
(375 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
14
280
0
81
Order By: Relevance
“…While young people may appear more adept with technology than older generations, and therefore more skilled or fluent in navigating devices and software, this outward display of confidence frequently masks inabilities to use technology effectively or judiciously. In his critique of the digital natives debate, Selwyn (2009) argues that empirical research portrays a more complex and nuanced picture of how young people actually use new technologies, rather than the digital native commentary promulgated by Prensky and other techno-centric commentators (Tapscott and Williams 2008;Veen and Vrakking 2006;Vandewater et al 2007). …”
Section: Digital Confidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While young people may appear more adept with technology than older generations, and therefore more skilled or fluent in navigating devices and software, this outward display of confidence frequently masks inabilities to use technology effectively or judiciously. In his critique of the digital natives debate, Selwyn (2009) argues that empirical research portrays a more complex and nuanced picture of how young people actually use new technologies, rather than the digital native commentary promulgated by Prensky and other techno-centric commentators (Tapscott and Williams 2008;Veen and Vrakking 2006;Vandewater et al 2007). …”
Section: Digital Confidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debate over what Selwyn (2009) describes as the exaggerations and inconsistencies associated with applying Prensky's (2001) concept of digital natives to the younger generation continues. It cannot be denied though, that students are all different and that using an all-inclusive term to label them is inaccurate and misleading.…”
Section: Perspectives On Students' It Use and Competencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some (e.g. Selwyn, 2009) advance the idea that rather than being competent, expert users of technology, many young people are in fact disempowered, disenchanted and alienated when it comes to technology-related activities.…”
Section: Perspectives On Students' It Use and Competencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent studies indicate that children and young people do not necessarily expect or even want to use technology in institutional settings such as schools or libraries in the same manner as they do at home (Lohnes & Kinzer, 2007). Indeed, young people appear to be more discerning in their desire to use (or not use) digital technologies in all aspects of their lives (Selwyn, 2009). …”
Section: The Reality Of Digital Natives In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%