2010
DOI: 10.1130/gsatg70a.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The digital revolution in geologic mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The cartographic uncertainty, while useful for conflation and integration purposes, will typically be minor compared with non-GPS based geographic uncertainties (Clegg et al, 2006;Whitmeyer, Nicoletti, & De Paor, 2010), particularly when field notes are not associated with the metadata, and the measuring and interpretive geological uncertainties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cartographic uncertainty, while useful for conflation and integration purposes, will typically be minor compared with non-GPS based geographic uncertainties (Clegg et al, 2006;Whitmeyer, Nicoletti, & De Paor, 2010), particularly when field notes are not associated with the metadata, and the measuring and interpretive geological uncertainties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to improvements in computer technology, traditional geological maps can be processed using digital procedures (Whitmeyer et al 2010;de Donatis et al 2012). Because of the need to measure geological elements, such as bedding plane and formation boundary in the field, the procedures use only indirect digitization methods, which convert field data from such geological elements into digital formats.…”
Section: Traditional and 3d Lidar-based Bedding Trace Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of approaches have been described in the literature including in-field GIS approaches emphasizing 3D recording with complex stratigraphy (Katsianis et al 2008), use of a GIS on a laptop or tablet together with orthorectification software (Craig 2000;Craig et al 2006;Doneus and Neubauer 2004), commercial software dedicated to interfacing with a total station on a pocket PC or tablet PC (Bradley 2006;Levy and Smith 2007;Ziebart et al 2002), and customized database software written for handheld computers (Skousen 2004;Tasic and Jevremovic 2004;Powlesland 2010: 104). Archaeological applications also benefit from advances in digital field methods in related disciplines like field geology (Apel 2006;Whitmeyer and Nicoletti 2010).…”
Section: Approaches To Digital Excavation Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%