2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63257-5_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Digitalization of Work and Social Justice: Reflections on the Labour Process of English Further Education Teachers

Abstract: The chapter sets the discussion within the broader socioeconomic context in which Further Education teachers labour, one characterised by underemployment and over-qualification, precariousness and the prevalence of 'rotten jobs'. In this context educational workers are subject to high levels of surveillance rooted in regimes of performativity and institutional risk aversion. Paradoxically these practices rest alongside what Glazer (2014) describes as 'busy work'-meaningless activities that distract us from int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This definition acknowledges that TEs' social settings and working conditions frame their achievement of agency when crafting their professional identities. Within macro-and meso-structures of national education policies and institutional policy implementation, those conditions and settings are currently saturated with managerial logics of neoliberal agency, austerity, digitalization, labor precariousness, and collegiality imposed "from above" (Avis & Reynolds, 2018;Samuelsson, 2018). This situation is troublesome when TEs are committed to raising students' critical awareness of the systemic barriers to learning for all, and prepare them to teach for social justice, defined as the just distribution of rights, opportunities and resources for everyone in society (Ketschau, 2015).…”
Section: Defining Key Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition acknowledges that TEs' social settings and working conditions frame their achievement of agency when crafting their professional identities. Within macro-and meso-structures of national education policies and institutional policy implementation, those conditions and settings are currently saturated with managerial logics of neoliberal agency, austerity, digitalization, labor precariousness, and collegiality imposed "from above" (Avis & Reynolds, 2018;Samuelsson, 2018). This situation is troublesome when TEs are committed to raising students' critical awareness of the systemic barriers to learning for all, and prepare them to teach for social justice, defined as the just distribution of rights, opportunities and resources for everyone in society (Ketschau, 2015).…”
Section: Defining Key Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although digitalization benefits the development of human resources (HRs) by allowing more people to access online educational resources at minimal cost, the global job market has not grown at a similar speed to provide more job opportunities (Avis & Reynolds, 2018). These workforce and economy composition changes have led to perceived overqualification —an employee's subjective perception of having capabilities (i.e., education, knowledge, experiences, and/or skills) that exceed the job requirements (C. H. Wu et al, 2022)—which has become prevalent among employees and developed as a salient human resource management (HRM) dilemma worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%