2022
DOI: 10.1111/josp.12471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dignity of work: An ethical argument against mandatory retirement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many autistic people face stigma and discrimination. 72,73 Given that unemployment is also associated with stigma, 74,75 and that workforce participation is considered important for a 'dignified' existence, 76 employment identities may offer autistic people a degree of protection against societal stigma. Further, several participants had to reconcile themselves with a late autism diagnosis during their retirement phase, resulting in a dual identity shift.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many autistic people face stigma and discrimination. 72,73 Given that unemployment is also associated with stigma, 74,75 and that workforce participation is considered important for a 'dignified' existence, 76 employment identities may offer autistic people a degree of protection against societal stigma. Further, several participants had to reconcile themselves with a late autism diagnosis during their retirement phase, resulting in a dual identity shift.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mandatory retirement is a clear example of institutional discrimination. Jecker (2022) argues that there are ethical arguments against mandatory retirement. The main argument is that workers are not treated individually but as a group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%