1941
DOI: 10.1021/ja01853a044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dipole Moment of Sulfanilamide and Related Compounds1,2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1946
1946
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 11 presents the dipole moments computed in the gas phase and different solvents (H 2 O, DMSO, CH 3 CN, MEOH, CHCl 3 , CCl 4 , C 6 H 12 ) at the different level of theories (HF, B3LYP and MP2) and basis sets using PCM and SMD solvation models. All the calculated dipole moments in the gas phase are larger than the experimental value [31], however, the dipole moment at B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) is close to the experimental value. The difference between experimental dipole moments and those calculated at B3LYP with different basis sets vary from 0.13 to 0.19 Debye, whereas for HF it ranges from 0.29 to the 0.51 Debye.…”
Section: Solvation Free Energy and Dipole Momentsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Table 11 presents the dipole moments computed in the gas phase and different solvents (H 2 O, DMSO, CH 3 CN, MEOH, CHCl 3 , CCl 4 , C 6 H 12 ) at the different level of theories (HF, B3LYP and MP2) and basis sets using PCM and SMD solvation models. All the calculated dipole moments in the gas phase are larger than the experimental value [31], however, the dipole moment at B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) is close to the experimental value. The difference between experimental dipole moments and those calculated at B3LYP with different basis sets vary from 0.13 to 0.19 Debye, whereas for HF it ranges from 0.29 to the 0.51 Debye.…”
Section: Solvation Free Energy and Dipole Momentsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The melting temperature determined in this work shows great consistency with the literature . However, it is slightly lower than the value reported in ref . The fusion enthalpy measured in this work is a little bigger than that in ref .…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The calculated geometric parameters for both HF and B3LYP methods* are practically the same, with deviations among them that are of the order of 1.7% for bond lengths, 0.66% for bond angles, and 1.21% for the dihedral ones. We studied two selected dihedral angles to corroborate the Kumler–Halverstad 10 and Kumler–Strait 11 proposal that the planarity of the amino group to the benzene ring is related to the bacteriostatic activity of the molecule. For the dihedral angles N4‐C7‐C5‐C6 and N4‐C7‐C8‐C9, a value of 180° is evidence of planarity and our results illustrated that all of the studied molecules present values for dihedral angles that are close to 180°.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…From a spectroscopic point of view, Kumler and Halverstad 10 and Kumler and Strait 11 studied sulfonamides and proposed a theory in which the amino group is coplanar to the benzene ring (as a result of the resonance of the amino free electron pair to the ring), proposing the planarity as the fundamental factor for the bacteriostatic activity. Later, Kumler and Daniels 12 hypothesized that another factor in the bacteriostatic activity of SNA‐type compounds is the negative charge of the SO 2 group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%