2020
DOI: 10.3764/aja.124.2.0215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dipylon Mistress: Social and Economic Complexity, the Gendering of Craft Production, and Early Greek Ceramic Material Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Would it not be convenient if she could examine these 3D models and have access to imperative forensic information without having to travel to Evansville, Indiana? Furthermore, when Hruby successfully completes her forensic anthropological investigation, the rippling effects of her findings will not only change how professionals conduct archaeological and anthropological work but will further validate new research in other subdivisions of archaeology such as S.C. Murray’s recent publication on gender studies and its reevaluation of women’s role in crafting Grecian ceramics in antiquity (Murray, Chorghay, and MacPherson 2020). Nonetheless, Hruby and Murray’s groundbreaking research hinges on the access to permanent collection objects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Would it not be convenient if she could examine these 3D models and have access to imperative forensic information without having to travel to Evansville, Indiana? Furthermore, when Hruby successfully completes her forensic anthropological investigation, the rippling effects of her findings will not only change how professionals conduct archaeological and anthropological work but will further validate new research in other subdivisions of archaeology such as S.C. Murray’s recent publication on gender studies and its reevaluation of women’s role in crafting Grecian ceramics in antiquity (Murray, Chorghay, and MacPherson 2020). Nonetheless, Hruby and Murray’s groundbreaking research hinges on the access to permanent collection objects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This hybrid character of Aeginetan pottery production does not facilitate the discussion of potters’ gender, as household production tends to be more in the domain of females, while more specialised production is in most cases carried out by men 35 . However, a recent overview of ethnographic accounts relating to gender and pottery production (Murray, Chorghay and MacPherson 2020) emphasised two main factors that impact the involvement of males in craft activities. One is the availability of land for agriculture securing self-sufficiency, the other the opportunity of a particular craft activity to secure profit.…”
Section: Socio-political Background Of Pottery Production On Aegina (Fourteenth To Early Twelfth Century Bc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Men were definitely more likely to leave their households for several months than women. In general, the mobility of women is determined by very different factors (see Cutler 2019, 86–8; Murray, Chorghay and MacPherson 2020, 230–1).…”
Section: Potters’ Mobility – Motivations Scales and Destinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%