2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00153-011-0256-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dirac delta function in two settings of Reverse Mathematics

Abstract: Abstract. The program of Reverse Mathematics ([18]) has provided us with the insight that most theorems of ordinary mathematics are either equivalent to one of a select few logical principles, or provable in a weak base theory. In this paper, we study the properties of the Dirac delta function ([3, 15]) in two settings of Reverse Mathematics. In particular, we consider the Dirac Delta Theorem, which formalizes the well-known property

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it is shown in [49] that the well-known property of the Dirac delta function (in the weak sense) is equivalent to WWKL 0 . All functions involved are at least continuous, and we believe that a more general theorem involving discontinuous functions yields WHBU.…”
Section: 44mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, it is shown in [49] that the well-known property of the Dirac delta function (in the weak sense) is equivalent to WWKL 0 . All functions involved are at least continuous, and we believe that a more general theorem involving discontinuous functions yields WHBU.…”
Section: 44mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we need WWKL to guarantee that the integral in MCT net exists, in light of [49,Theorem 10]. Arzelà already studied the monotone convergence theorem (involving sequences) for the Riemann integral in 1885, and this theorem is moreover proved in e.g.…”
Section: Nets and Weak Compactnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From P [STP ↔ CC ns ], terms t, s can be extracted such that E-PA * (∀Θ 3 ) SFF(Θ) → MU 3 (t(Θ)) ∧ (∀Ξ 3 ) MU 3 (Ξ) → SFF(s(Ξ)) . (6.23) As shown in [62], WWKL 0 is equivalent to the statement that every bounded continuous functional on the unit interval is Riemann integrable. We suspect that adding a boundedness condition to Y 2 ∈ C ns yields an equivalence to LMP.…”
Section: Generalisations Of Weak König's Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus (p k ) k , v = 2 is a code for the integral of the mollifier. For the proof of this proposition we will need the following notation and theorem from [17]. A partition of [0, 1] is a finite set…”
Section: The Space Of Functions Of Bounded Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%